Environment

Background

World Bank green bonds

29 September 2014 | Inside the institutions

Green bonds are called “green” because they direct finance to environment or climate-related projects. They are issued by corporations, investment banks, local authorities and multilateral development banks (MDBs). Bonds are a form of debt investment where an investor lends money to an entity (corporate or government) that borrows the funds for a defined period of time at a fixed interest rate to finance projects and activities. Types of green bonds include: green infrastructure bonds, multilateral development bank green bonds, green corporate bonds, green sectoral bonds, rainforest bonds and index-linked carbon bonds. In total $18.3 billion (approx. £10.7 billion) worth of green bonds were issued in the first half of 2014. They are projected to double by the end of 2014 raising the overall issuance to $40 billion. Companies issued $10.2 billion (55 per cent) in 2014 as compared to $3 billion (27 per cent) last year.

There is no single standard to define green bonds, resulting in organisations following their own definitions and internal rules to issue green bonds and guide lending. Several issuers, including the IFC, use guidance from research agencies such as the Norway-based organisation, the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (CICERO). Civil society organisations have questioned whether all of the energy types financed via green bonds are green given the emissions of greenhouse gases associated with, for example, large dams and hydropower projects, and other consequent negative environmental impacts (see Observer Spring 2014).

The World Bank Group issues green bonds through its middle income country arm the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and its private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation (IFC). The Bank has been issuing bonds in the international capital markets for over 60 years to fund its activities.  It has raised up to $6.7 billion in green bonds through 70 transactions in 17 different currencies. It is in an advantageous position to issue green bonds as it is a publicly-backed lender with a triple-A credit rating. The Bank defines green bonds as “fixed-income bonds that are liquid financial instruments to fund climate-mitigation, adaptation and other environment-friendly projects.” Its green bond projects aim to support the transition to low carbon and climate resilient development in client countries. In addition, the projects also undergo a review and approval process to meet client countries’ development priorities, which includes early screening to identify potential environmental or social impacts and designing policies and concrete actions to mitigate such impacts in line with the Bank’s environmental and social safeguard policies. Mitigation projects include:

  • solar and wind installations,
  • support for the expansion of technologies aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
  • increased efficiency in transportation and waste management,
  • construction of energy-efficient buildings, and
  • carbon reduction through reforestation and avoided deforestation.

Examples of adaptation projects include:-

  • protection against flooding,
  • food security improvement,
  • implementation of stress-resilient agricultural systems and
  • sustainable forest management and avoided deforestation.

The Bank states that the benefits through green bond projects can be measured both in terms of “benefits to society” and “reduction of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.”

The IFC issues green bonds for “investing exclusively in renewable energy, energy efficiency and other climate-friendly projects in developing countries”. These are being used to finance projects which fall under the Bank’s definition of “low-carbon”, rather than “renewable”, a category that includes energy projects whose climate and environmental impacts have been questioned (see Update 77). Currently the IFC is in the process of launching a new programme in the USA that allows individual investors to buy IFC bonds that support renewable energy and energy efficiency investments in developing countries.

As mentioned above, the World Bank group supports the growth of the green bond market through IBRD and the IFC, both of which “catalyse the market through strategic issuances of green bonds based on their triple-A ratings.” A majority of the green bonds projects appear to be carried out in middle-income countries (see table below). According to the Bank’s website, the highest number of projects financed by its green bonds are implemented in China, with a focus on urban areas including urban transportation, waste management and energy efficiency in industrial units. There appears to be less focus on promoting development in rural regions. This is also replicated in other countries.

The Bank’s green bond projects (IBRD funded)

Country No. Projects
China 19 Solar, water management and flooding prevention, drainage improvement, urban transport, eco-farming, forest restoration and development, hydropower, energy efficiency
Mexico 6 Forest and climate change, energy efficiency, urban transport transformation, modernization of the national meteorological service for improved climate adaptation
India 3 Power system development, hydropower, urban transport transformation
Tunisia 3 Energy efficiency, mountain and forest development, water sector investment
Brazil 2 Solid Waste, carbon finance, urban rail transit
Indonesia 2 Geothermal energy, water resources and irrigation
Turkey 2 Private sector renewable energy, energy efficiency
Morocco 2 Solar power, solid waste development
Ukraine 2 Energy efficiency, power transmission project in support of energy sector reform and development
Uruguay 1 Sustainable management of resources, climate change
Jordan 1 Solid waste management, carbon finance
Jamaica 1 Energy security and efficiency
Peru 1 Rural electrification
Montenegro 1 Energy efficiency in public buildings
Macedonia & Serbia 1 Catastrophe risk insurance
Colombia 1 National urban transit
Dominican Republic 1 Emergency recovery and disaster risk

Source: http://treasury.worldbank.org/cmd/htm/MoreGreenProjects.html (See link for latest updates on projects)

According to the Bank, its green bond projects are “designed to reduce poverty and improve local economies” but they also have a specific focus on “tackling climate change issues that directly impact developing countries.” In promoting energy efficient projects in China, for example, the stated purpose is “to mainstream investment in energy conservation in China’s industrial sector.” Here the objective is to improve the energy efficiency of medium and large-sized industrial enterprises in China, and thereby reduce negative environmental impacts. However, poverty reduction, the achievement of developmental outcomes and the improvement of local economies are not outlined as desired outcomes in the project document. Moreover, the beneficial outcomes on the population and their livelihoods are not explicitly accounted for.

Latest articles on this issue

Environment

Analysis

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 13

New edition of the Bretton Woods Project's biannual Climate Investment Fund (CIFs) Monitor, published to coincide with the World Bank-hosted CIFs trust fund committee meetings.

13 June 2016

Environment

Analysis

Clean Technology Fund (CTF)

The upcoming Clean Technology Fund (CTF) resource shortfall continues to raise concerns. A proposal for “CTF 2.0” will be discussed, including two proposed modalities: CTF Green Markets and the Risk Mitigation Facility. Concerns were raised over safeguards for a geothermal energy project in Indonesia.

13 June 2016

Environment

Analysis

Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)

The Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) has called for urgent donations to be able to finance projects pending approval. The CIF strategic directions paper proposed for a new private sector window to be set up. Concerns were raised about community consultations in Samoa and around resettlement risks related to a Haiti project.

13 June 2016

Environment

Analysis

Forest Investment Program (FIP)

The rationale for adding new pilot countries to the Forest Investment Program (FIP) given funding constraints has been questioned, as well as the focus on providing loans rather than grants. The CIF strategic directions paper noted challenges for the FIP, and proposed a new private sector window. Questions were raised about the consultation of ethnic minorities in relation to a Laos project.

13 June 2016

Environment

Analysis

Scaling Up Renewable Energy Program (SREP)

Concerns continues over slow progress in implementing the Scaling up Renewable Energy Program in Low Income Countries (SREP) investments plans and lack of funding for new pilot countries, as well as constraints on grant resources. The CIF strategic directions paper proposed an enhanced private sector programme for energy access. Questions on consideration of indigenous peoples were raised in relation to Liberia and Tanzania projects.

13 June 2016

Environment

Commentary

A critical juncture for forests: Will the World Bank rise to meet the global challenge?

World Bank is called to take a leadership role in reducing deforestation and promote community forest management, including through its new Forest Action Plan.

9 February 2016 | Comment

Environment

Analysis

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 12

New edition of the Bretton Woods Project's biannual Climate Investment Fund (CIFs) Monitor, published to coincide with the World Bank-hosted CIFs committee meetings.

4 November 2015

Environment

Analysis

Clean Technology Fund (CTF)

An impending shortfall in available resources for the Clean Technology Fund continues to concern, leading to cancellation of projects. Questions were raised about development impacts and reliance on geothermal energy in India and Indonesia's revised investment plans, and on debt sustainability in a Caribbean project.

4 November 2015

Environment

Analysis

Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)

The Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) has expanded with ten countries despite a lack of funds. The US questioned the approval of a Bolivia project and resettlement issues were raised on two Cambodia projects.

4 November 2015

Environment

Analysis

Forest Investment Program (FIP)

Six new countries were invited to join the Forest Investment Program (FIP), with a further nine invited to develop investment plans, despite insufficient funds. Potential support for oil palm plantations in Democratic Republic of Congo and industrial logging in Indonesia and Peru were questioned.

4 November 2015